<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mindset of the mob &#8211; a response to John Waters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rossduggan.ie/blog/technology/mindset-of-the-mob-a-response-to-john-waters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rossduggan.ie/blog/technology/mindset-of-the-mob-a-response-to-john-waters/</link>
	<description>On technology, coding and communities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:58:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: SirJolt</title>
		<link>http://rossduggan.ie/blog/technology/mindset-of-the-mob-a-response-to-john-waters/comment-page-1/#comment-4978</link>
		<dc:creator>SirJolt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rossduggan.ie/?p=372#comment-4978</guid>
		<description>Solid post, I find it ironic that Waters&#039; article seemed so contemptuous of the back and forth relationship that web-based writing/reporting often involves in a medium that is fundamentally devoid of that kind of feedback. I know I&#039;m not adding a tremendous amount to the debate here, but the whole thing rubbed me the wrong way in a, &quot;Look how good I am, are you not impressed by the fact that this text has been printed? it is on paper... that makes me better than you,&quot; kind of fashion.

Again, might just be me, but I felt a little riled by the whole debate. Of course, not having a medium in which to respond, I did what comes naturally... I forgot about it and got on with my life. 

I think it might be better to engage a bit more with a readership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid post, I find it ironic that Waters&#8217; article seemed so contemptuous of the back and forth relationship that web-based writing/reporting often involves in a medium that is fundamentally devoid of that kind of feedback. I know I&#8217;m not adding a tremendous amount to the debate here, but the whole thing rubbed me the wrong way in a, &#8220;Look how good I am, are you not impressed by the fact that this text has been printed? it is on paper&#8230; that makes me better than you,&#8221; kind of fashion.</p>
<p>Again, might just be me, but I felt a little riled by the whole debate. Of course, not having a medium in which to respond, I did what comes naturally&#8230; I forgot about it and got on with my life. </p>
<p>I think it might be better to engage a bit more with a readership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/21 queries in 0.017 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 0/0 objects using memcached

Served from: rossduggan.ie @ 2012-05-19 05:11:02 -->
